Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Freeplane File Format (Proposal)"
From Freeplane - free mind mapping and knowledge management software
(comments about ODF structure and first step.) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
## Chapter 4 - Metadata | ## Chapter 4 - Metadata | ||
## Chapters 21 and 22 - "Document processing" and "Conformance" | ## Chapters 21 and 22 - "Document processing" and "Conformance" | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Naming prefixes - alternatives == | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Ewl|Ewl]] 15:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As an afterthough, I thought that 'mmap' and 'mm-office' might be better XML prefixes instead of 'map' and 'x-office'. What do you think? | ||
Latest revision as of 10:16, 1 September 2010
--Ewl 08:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC) :
Based on ODF 1.2, the following approach is suggested to start with:
- Ignore all together Part 2 (Open Formula)
- Implement Part 3 (Packages) with little adaptations
- Implement from Part 1, the chapters related to the structure of the document and ignore the ones more related to content and format, as to not completely break the current .mm based format. Namely, the following chapters should be implemented (with necessary adaptations):
- Chapter 3 - Document Structure
- Chapters 3.4 to 3.9 without object, to be replaced through <office:map>
- Chapter 4 - Metadata
- Chapters 21 and 22 - "Document processing" and "Conformance"
- Chapter 3 - Document Structure
Naming prefixes - alternatives
--Ewl 15:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
As an afterthough, I thought that 'mmap' and 'mm-office' might be better XML prefixes instead of 'map' and 'x-office'. What do you think?
